Vioxx Personal Injury Lawsuits

Vioxx Personal Injury Lawsuits



Vioxx Personal Injury Lawsuits
Personal injury attorneys representing clients who have allegedly been harmed by the​ prescription ​Drug​ Vioxx are congratulating themselves over a​ historic judgment rendered recently. On August 19,​ 2018,​ a​ judge awarded the​ family of​ Bob Ernst $253. 4 million due to​ his death from the​ ​Drug​. Vioxx,​ which had been prescribed most often for arthritis pain,​ was withdrawn globally by its maker,​ Merck,​ after research trials showed it​ increased patients chances of​ a​ heart attack. Although Merck pulled the​ ​Drug​ off the​ market in​ September 2004,​ legal action against this leading pharmaceutical giant will continue and expand. Let’s take a​ look at​ why Vioxx has become a​ litigation lightning rod.
In 1998 as​ Merck was running clinical trials for Vioxx,​ company reports to​ the​ FDA stated that there were no cardiovascular signals apparent. This meant that there were no telltale signs that the​ ​Drug​ could cause heart problems for users. Later,​ however,​ it​ was revealed that an internal study conducted by Merck around the​ same time Study 090 revealed serious cardiovascular problems as​ compared to​ patients not taking Vioxx. the​ study was never published by Merck as​ the​ company insisted that it​ was not large enough to​ provide definitive data.
The following year the​ FDA gave Vioxx its approval and the​ ​Drug​ became the​ second nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication [or COX2 inhibitor] to​ hit the​ market. Celebrex,​ another problem ​Drug​,​ was the​ first.
Merck widely and thoroughly launched a​ marketing campaign upon the​ introduction of​ Vioxx to​ the​ marketplace. Indeed,​ by 2003 the​ ​Drug​ had entered 80 nations with sales exceeding $2. 5 billion. Still,​ there were problems looming as​ ongoing tests conducted by Merck hinted of​ potential deadly side effects.
As early as​ 2001,​ the​ FDA recommended label warnings be put on​ prescriptions warning users of​ potential side effects. in​ addition,​ Merck was warned by the​ FDA to​ quit misleading physicians about potential side effects.
As potential problems began to​ surface,​ they served as​ red flags to​ industry watchdogs,​ to​ the​ FDA,​ as​ well as​ to​ personal injury attorneys who began to​ gather evidence to​ show that Merck was negligent. Indeed,​ web sites and advertising campaigns meant to​ inform and attract patients harmed by the​ ​Drug​ were launched and fairly soon the​ internet,​ radio,​ television,​ and print media were flooded with advertisements asking those suspecting harm from Vioxx to​ come forward.
With the​ September 2004 announcement that Merck was withdrawing Vioxx,​ personal injury litigation was well on​ its way to​ being established. By early 2018,​ the​ first cases were filed and the​ Ernst case became the​ first Vioxx lawsuit to​ be settled.
Wrongful death lawsuits against Vioxx’s maker,​ Merck,​ are expected to​ increase as​ the​ result of​ the​ Ernst decision. Personal injury attorneys insist that thousands of​ former Vioxx users and/or their families are due compensation for Merck’s neglect. it​ remains to​ be seen if​ juries will render judgments as​ large as​ the​ Ernst judgment and whether courts will uphold these amounts. Nevertheless,​ it​ is​ certain that Merck is​ in​ for a​ long battle that will reach well beyond its US base.




You Might Also Like:




No comments:

Powered by Blogger.